MUHAMMAD ARIF versus STATE
Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Sections 497, 103 and 165 (4) Prohibited (Enforcement Hadith) Order (4 of 1979), Articles 3/4 guarantee, Grant of provisions of Sections 103 and 165 (4), CR PC was not. The search and recovery of the alleged heroin from the suspect's possession was complied with because no independent / notable witness to the area was attached to which only two grams of heroin was sent to the Chemical Examiner, even I can't even come up with a positive report. Under the Prohibition Clause of Section 7 ofit, the accused, the CC accused, was behind bars for the last seven months and it has also been proved by the prosecution that the accused was neither a former criminal nor a hardened criminal. And now the police were not allowed to bail the accused. As was the case under Section 497 (2), CR PC
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
lawer from fb area from FR Bannu lawyer