FAUJI SUGAR MILLS versus PROVINCE OF THE PUNJAB
Sugar Factories Control Act 1950 Section 16A [which includes the Sugar Factories Control Punjab (Amendment) Act (1991)] Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 18 and 199 Constitutional Application Section 16A, Sugar Factories Control Act, 1950 Under [as incorporated by Act II of 1991] the Sugar Factories Control Act of Article 18 of the Constitution, the Amendment Act under the Amendment of the Constitution in 1950 increased the applicants (counting factories) Payment is ordered. The price, which was already fixed, may, of course, ask the applicant to pay additional costs for the reasons specified by the notification but no such notification has been issued, no additional cost in the form of a standard premium. Applicants cannot be requested. Not only was the report sufficient to curb the government's action in raising such additional demand, not only arbitrary but to pay the same extra cost to testers who were already paying the illegal and unconstitutional price. Could not be compelled twice, even otherwise, the insertion of Section 16A in the Sugar Factories Control Act, 1950, would violate the fundamental right as Article 18 of the Constitution guarantees. According to which every citizen has the right to go to any legal profession or profession and to run any legal business or business. Applicants have been instructed to increase Section 16A of the Sugar Factories Control Act of 1950 to make additional demands on the nature of sanctions on their business. The activity was unconstitutional and an illegal piece of legislation and a place for applicants
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate from Usta Mohammad lawyer