Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASHIQ HUSSAIN versus ABIDA BEGUM

Civil Code of Regulation 1908 Section 47 and AXXI, 10 and 28 of the West Pakistan Family Courts Act (XXXV of 1964), Section 5 and Schedule suit, processing of the claim of the plaintiff for the recovery of Dover, Rs. For the recovery of the case and a house which was decided by the Judge Family Court in favor of the plaintiff's appellate court, the appeal decided that the indoor money received by the husband would be only Rs. 25,000 which was approved by the trial court. The amended amendment was an order of execution, so only Rs. 25,000 in this regard and nothing more than execution of the court's competency decree. D was limited and had no option to go back to the decree and look at the documents that were part of the evidence, which was decided by the appellate court during the execution proceedings. It cannot be justified by the Executive Court because, as of the appellate court's order, the incorporation or abandonment of anything was not the job of the Executive Court. The relevant executive court was directed by the High Court to recover only the amount demanded from the husband / wife for the judgment which was to be paid to the decree holder / wife. immigration advocates contact from Ahmed pur Sial lawyer