UMMATULLAH BEGUM versus MUHAMMAD AKHTAR
Special Relief Act 1877 Section 12 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Section 144 According to the order of the plaintiff of the court, the specific amount deposited by the plaintiff amounted to the order of the trial court but later refunded to the extent of the expenses incurred. Will be taken away. It had the appellate court ordering the plaintiff to deposit extra money, on which it deposited the lesser amount of costs owed to it by the trial court, which the High Court found was the amount collected by the plaintiff. Is less than what it was supposed to submit to the appellate court order. The amount that he did not submit was what he withdrew. The appellate court directed the parties to bear the costs. The High Court directed the plaintiff to collect the remaining amount (which, by the order of the appellate court). Was less money) \ r \ nWith the auction, the amount will be 6% profit from the date of the decree its r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for fresh advocates from Kurram lawyer