MUHAMMADZORAB versus POSTMASTER-GENERAL,AJK&F.C.ISLAMABAD
Mandatory Retirement from Job 4 and 5 The mandatory retirement sentence from the job was levied on a public servant that, as an Assistant Superintendent Post Office, it renewed at a reduced rate of arms licenses, resulting in a public employee and co-official. The employee suffered both injuries. The master and those who formally renewed the arm licenses were run under the Government Employees (Talent and Discipline) Pills, 1973, but the co-government employee, who was actually responsible for renewing the licenses, gave only two. Penalties were imposed on the withholding of increments, while the civil servant was merely a caretaker and the mandatory retirement public servant was punished with less responsibility for the crime even though I could not be acquitted of his supervisory role. But could only be accused of "negligence" because it had to check the admission of a tire license. And beware, the mandatory retirement penalty given to a civil servant was not in line with the charge. In view of the obvious discrimination in dealing with the case of public servant and co-employee in the case of granting exemptions, the orders for compulsory retirement approved against the public servant were set aside and instead served for two years. Was fined for two increments. Imposed on a civil servant
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
