Find a Lawyer

QAMAR JEHAN versus MAHBOOB ALI KHAN

Law Reform Ordinance 1972 R 148 Law Reform Ordinance (XII of 1972), Section 3 appeals to the intra-court that prevented the plaintiff's lawyer representing the plaintiff from prosecuting him and his client, the plaintiff. Thus, the R148 has been exceeded. , Legal Practitioners and Bar Councils Rules 1976 were rejected by the High Court. The High Court held that there was no case of conflict of interest between the lawyer and the client, as the lawyer was not claiming any interest in the matter. Neither the plaintiff nor the plaintiff charged him with any interest in the fact that the defendant maintained the right that the lawyer had the right to the property in question as the legal heir of the defendant and, thus, , Which conflicted with the interests of the plaintiff council, however, never claimed any interest in supporting the disputed interest, if any, in terms of R148, to the Legal Practitioners and Bar Council Council Rules, 1976 Must be sought by a lawyer and client. The lves and the third party, quite the contrary, are not entitled to accuse such interest in harming any of the lawyer or client's affairs, however, indicating that the plaintiff and his lawyer In the case of the alleged collusion between the defendants, the version of the defendant will be formed. But whether or not the same case was set up and what was the result, it was another matter and to deal with it, rather than the interests of the lawyer and his client and his lawyer. To the conflict. Acquire any conflicting interests and so on property advocates from Islamabad lawyer