NAZAR MUHAMMAD versus SULTAN AHMAD
Failure to redeem residential land within section 10 (3) and 13 of the West Pakistan Holding Ordinance 1960, redemption and maintenance of the Mortgage and Land Act (V 1945), Article 3 Limitation Act (IX of 1908). The mortgage in question was a mortgage through the respondent / mortgage in the interest of the applicants, but the mortgage was not redeemed, despite a fixed period of sixty years, the suit was dedicated to redeem the mortgaged land. Thus, the applicants did not lie who were the legal heirs. Regarding late mortgages, under section under Restriction and Restoration Maintenance Act was banned, even though applying for its redemption respondents / mortgages, the mortgages of mortgaged land owners The position was assumed and could not be recorded as mortgage of the land. The legal heirs of the dispute and late mortgages were not eligible to challenge the defendants' status. The principle of restriction contained in Section 3, the Efficiency and Mortgage Maintenance Act, 64 of 1964, was that the defendants were obliged to respond. I bind the separate rules and change their status from mortgage to rights holder.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate from Muzaffarabad lawyer