Evidence recorded in one of the six different cases registered against the section 409 Corruption Act (II of 1947), section 5 (2) Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898), sections 233, 366 and 367 Was later quoted in the other five cases in which no separate examination of the prosecution's witnesses was conducted by the Chief and cross-examination, after the preparation of the documents by the witnesses, the exhibition numbers were left blank in the submitted sheets. Later, the handwriting was filled up not to appoint witnesses separately and in the presence of witnesses in the witness box, the trial court found the remaining five sacred The beat should have entered separate evidence for each witness, and all documents shown for display during the recording of the evidence should be given separately. The criminal trial had failed
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
