Find a Lawyer

SHAMSULLAHKHAN versus MUHAMMADAKRAMKHAN

Sections 9, 13 and 14 (6) of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Contract (Ombudsman) Act 1992, the Rules of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Civil Servants (Qualification and Discipline) Act, 1977, R4 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act, 1974 Establishment. Section 42: Complaint filed against such officers recommends disciplinary action against education officers of the department. Waldetti Ombudsman recommended action by the appellant against the officers concerned in which allegations of corruption against the officers concerned. The provisions of section 14 (6) of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Act, 1992 have been construed to constitute office ombudsman (ombudsman) if the ombudsman has any reason to believe that a government employee has The Ombudsman recommended such action only if it was a criminal or disciplinary action warrant against him. Y And it did not approve any negative order, was qualified under the Ombudsman to make such a reference and was not required to afford the opportunity for a hearing at the reference stage, which would have the public support in a regular inquiry. Has no right to insist that it cannot be questioned under the rules of competence and discipline. EE was launched without the opportunity to prosecute him or determine the innocence of such officers. Would be subjected to regular High Court inquiry in which he rejected the recommendation of the Ombudsman on the basis that any matter before him The petition was not filed by the concerned person, so the High Court's view was not valid, so the Ombudsman may recommend such an inquiry, however, the Mutual Ombudsman, in accordance with Section 9 Not billed under property advocates from Dera Murad Jamali lawyer