Find a Lawyer

GENERAL MANAGER, KAGHAN INTENSIVE FOREST MANAGEMENT PROJECT,ABBOTTABAD versus MASSARAT PERWEEN

Sections 3, 4, 8 and 30 of the Workers' Compensation Act, 1923, and Schedule 2, Item No. (xxiii), the widow of the victim's compensation, before the Commissioner for Worker's Compensation, claimed that she was the widow of the deceased. He died during his employment at the place where he was staying overnight during his employment, entitled to sanction of compensation, the evidence presented on record completely proved that the late employer was an employee of the department. Whose duties were under item number (xxiii). Of Schedule 2 under the Workman's Compensation Act, 1923, and that his death occurred during his employment when the employer failed to prove that the defendant was not a regular employee, but was a small contractor, the Commissioner for Workers' Compensation, In order to provide properly compensated compensation to the widow entitled to compensation that the deceased died by accident during her employment, and the employer was obliged to pay the compensation L. Hours (Amendment) Ordinance, 1993, under which The compensation amount was raised from 30,000 to 100,000, after the death was implemented after the death, the widow of the deceased increased by Rs 100,000. The money received will not be entitled as it has no prejudice effect. The widow of the deceased shall be entitled to receive only Rs. 30,000 from the amended law lawer from fb area from Gharo lawyer