Find a Lawyer

ROSE NYOKABI WACIRA versus STATE

The Customs Act 1969 section 156 (1) (8) was not refused to draw samples from the confiscated heroin powder, and it can only be claimed that the investigating officer could be considered as extracting samples from only one bag. The rest of the three bags could not be brought into custody as a result of the reduction in the contents of the sentence, but the investigating officer's mistake, if it was committed, did not make the suspect's heroin recovery suspicious, according to the Chemical Examiner's evidence. Two possibilities came up with regard to the percentage of heroin, that could include 100% pure heroin or less and The probability of supporting the accused was also taken into account for the purpose of determining the amount, resulting in the conviction of the offender, but reduced his seven-year sentence to four years. Gaya \ RI and a fine of Rs 2 lakh were exempted how to become a advocate from Mansehra lawyer