Find a Lawyer

SAEEDAHMAD versus CHAIRMAN,WAPDA

R 2 (5) Government employees were fined for being an executive engineer for adopting unfair means to conceal power theft in their area, which resulted in the fake and fraudulent data of power units received from the grid station. The count was identified and to send a report to the sub divisional officer. (Section DO) Inquiries were held against a government employee for displaying false data and high-ranking officials imposed a fine on the time scale for a period of one year. What later turned it into a censorship case in fines. Disciplinary action, the Inquiry Officer fairly dealt with all charges against a public servant and came to the conclusion that during his term he was accused of stealing electricity from consumers because XEN was not proven because the prosecution had no one to prove the charge. Could not produce evidence, but the inquiry officer was of the view that the civil servant had submitted a monthly line loss statement based on the fictitious FIFA to the government employees also to confirm a step down penalty on the time scale for a period of one year. Was found responsible for forwarding false statements without line access, ap TM authority had the right to change the situation. famous high court advocate from Tall lawyer