Find a Lawyer

ASHIQ MUHAMMAD versus KARAM

Land Reforms Act 1977 Section 15 (3) Punjab Land Reforms (Regulation for Withdrawal Suit), 1977, Rr 13 and 15 Punjab Land Reforms (Regulation for Land Grants), 1978, Rr 8 and 9 uncontested resumes The land allotment petitioner was challenged by the Land Commissioner claiming to be the senior tenant of the land in dispute with the defendants, but the amendment filed by the applicants against the appellate court order His appeal was dropped when he was stopped. The order of the allotment was not challenged by the applicants in the favor of the appellate court, final status was obtained and secondly, the Chief Land Commissioner Landland Commissioner could not interfere with the orders approved by the Chief Land Commissioner. Was, however, unable to interfere with the orders passed by the appellate. The court, but the orders passed by the appellate court, could not be finalized because the final communication of the MS Rules, 1977 orders pursuant to the provisions of R15, Punjab Land Reform, was subject to the other provisions of IV. The Rules have given the Chief Land Commissioner the power to automatically inspect orders approved by the subordinate officers at any time otherwise the courts have not acted as follows. Publication of a notice inviting applications for an unexpected re-mainland land commissioner's grant for the exercise of sovereign review options, as required by R9 of the Punjab Land Reforms (Grant for Grant) Rules 1978 In relation to, the orders and pawns approved by the courts separately best law firms from Umer Kot lawyer