Find a Lawyer

SAEED ALI versus INDUS MOTORS CO. LTD.

Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VI of 1968), Sections O15 (3) (a) (h) and (4) Employees dismissed after employment. Show notices and make inquiries against the allegations made that they not only refused to give their officers proper and legitimate orders, but also threatened that the superiors employed employees against the inquiry officer or the inquiry process. No allegations of enmity or prejudice were made by The record on their evidence either in their complaint notice or in the complaint request or in their affidavit in the evidence proved that the inquiry officer had been honest, fair and impartial in the charges against the employees. Inquiries as to and with no influence of employer employees. Neither in their complaint notice nor in their complaint requests nor in their affidavit did they allege that Ho had provided evidence of enmity or enmity against them in the domestic investigation. The mismanagement of which led to their being terminated from employment, employees were rightfully dismissed and dismissal order could not be interfered with. top advocate from Besham lawyer