Find a Lawyer

GHAUS KHAN versus NAZIR KHAN

In the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act 1967 section 164 land-exchange settlement operations, four Marla in the name of the applicant in the revenue record were given the land to the respondent while the equivalent area was withdrawn in the name of the respondent. The land was challenged in the appeal by the applicant / appellant, but his appeal was dismissed on the basis of limitations primarily by the Additional Commissioner / Appellate Court. Was. The copy of the transfer order was not attached and in the presence of the parties in the dispute settlement / transfer proceedings, the order of the appellate court below was not on merit but on technical grounds which proved that not only The land in dispute, his name was in Jambandi, but his name was also in the reality of the file, claiming that he had worked hard and energy in planting fruit trees on the disputed land = held, his Deciding the matter may be more appropriate. The Board of Revenue, which accepted only technical competence rather than qualification, rejected the order passed by the appellate court below and demanded a remand decision and a remanded case. Pakistan, top advocate family court from Kotri lawyer