PAKISTAN CHEMICALS LIMITED versus SINDH LABOUR APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, KARACHI
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25 Complaint Notice The notice filed by the employees against termination of their services was dismissed solely on the basis of the notice of complaint by the employee to the employer. The employee was not self-signed or through a stack store. The main purpose of signing a document or notice was that the person who gave the notice or endorsed a document should not deny it in the future and the person to whom it was intended. Should know. This notice was given, if not signed, if it disclosed the facts and the person receiving it knew who sent it, if the employer knew it fully. If the notice was received in the dispute, then I also know who sent it. This notice and the employer also responded to the notice, communication of the notice in writing, as the law required, the appellate tribunal came right in the conclusion that the notice sent to the employer, even though the employee did not sign. Was still a notice of legal complaint under section 25A of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of advocates from Kotli Loharan lawyer