Find a Lawyer

TARIQ MAHMOOD NIZAMI versus NADEEM AFZAL

The Civil Procedure Code of Civil Procedure Code Order VI VI generally amended the requests for introduction of new CAs 0 VI, R 17 and section 115 in the CA, rejecting the dismissal petition, stating that the request was amended in writing. Would be inconsistent. Courts must already be taken in defense of accuracy, though it should be liberal in allowing the necessary amendment requests to determine the matters behind the dispute, but it must also be proven and the defense must already be It cannot be allowed to be established nor can its nature be changed. Therefore, it was to be introduced that the plaintiffs obtained the transfer of underground land from the authorities through fraud and misrepresentation. Such amendment would be equivalent to establishing a new case and running the original written statement which The defendant's case was that he had no possession. The specific property belonged to the plaintiffs but was occupied by another proprietor. The rty owner may, for the first time, raise a new request for fraud and misrepresentation by the plaintiff, editing the written statement in favor of the defendant. Could not challenge the transfer authority, which was primarily a matter between the plaintiff and the plaintiff's father. Earlier in the lawsuit it was admitted that he was not taking possession of any of the claimant's property, but the land owned by the plaintiff being the son of the claimant and acting in the interest of his father. But he had control over which he could not establish another person. In his proposed written statement, which is owned by his own father list of advocates from Gohar Ghoushti lawyer