Find a Lawyer

HABIB-UD-DIN versus HARNIDA BANO

Specific Relief Act 1877 Section 56 (i) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 The excavation of the land attached to the wall of the claimant's house thus jeopardizing the life of the claimant's family and The property is damaged. As a result of the effect that this wall may collapse at any time and cause irreparable damage, the court was obliged to comply with Section 56 (i), the Special Relief Act, in the context of such concerns and danger. Ordered to take remedial measures to avoid it. 1877 The Appellate Court and the High Court acted irrationally to deny the plaintiff's assistance, which was granted by the trial court only to wait for the day in which the wall collapsed. And the original injury was sustained. Damages can be justified on the basis of losses. The material on the record indicates that the plaintiff has been able to prove that the claimant is entitled to relief The judgment of the High Court and the Appellate Court was set aside while the trial court's decree and decision were amended accordingly. It was held that the defendant would take all necessary steps to protect the wall lying between his house and the plaintiff's house, and to raise the enclosed security wall, if after the notice presented by the court through the execution notice. If the defendant fails to raise this particular wall, the defendant may raise the wall with the help of the court at his own expense. S but will not be entitled to claim it. Any proprietary rights in the land under such wall list of advocates from Musafir Khana lawyer