MUSHRAFKHAN versus SECRETARY,FOOD,AGRICULTURE,LIVESTOCK,DAIRYDEVELOPMENTANDCOOPERATIVEDEPARTMENT,PESHAWAR
Section 4 Termination of Services After the Department of Finance turned the development plan into an existing budget (non-development plan), 80 staff members of the Grade 1 staff of the Government employee were eliminated and the services of such employees through the Government Employees Department Service Terminated. The precinct was temporary, which could be terminated at any time without notice. The civil servant failed to prove that he had retained junior officers, no selection and no records from the election department. There was no illegal interference or any kind of offensive activity by the department. Regarding the termination of the services of public servants because there was no funding available in the current budget by the Department of Finance, the civilian employee could not, in these circumstances, challenge his dismissal.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
divorce advocates from Kharan lawyer
