ABDUL SATTAR versus AHMAD SHAH
In the case of pre-discrimination charges filed under Section 13 of the Punjab Pre-Emission Act 1991, he was charged with ownership of his land and his joint ownership was also given to the plaintiff on account of his ownership and common property. Was available. Although the plaintiffs provided under S: 13, Punjab Pre-Emission Act, 1991 did not meet the requirements of the interpretation, in fact it was not claimed in the material intake that the requirement of holidays had been fulfilled. Provision of law under section 13 (3) may create turmoil in the presence of an empress empathy case before the pond in the Punjab Pre-Emission Act, 1991.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocate from Nowshera Cantt lawyer
