CHAIRMAN,WAPDA,LAHORE versus GULBATKHAN
Civil Procedure Code Order XPL Original Decisions to Separate Any Penalty Provided by Law on Remand to Case by the Appeals of the CPC O XLI, R 23 Constitution of Pakistan (1973); Article 212 Service Tribunal Accessories Service Tribunal or It has the option of substituting where the question of conviction arises, so there is no need to remand the case / remand to the authorized / authorized authority to re-consider the matter. Where an order was insufficient to pass judgment and the material on record, the court may remand the case when the court concludes that by examining the material on the record or the disputed facts, the conviction or The order was fully approved. Discretionary and illegal, there will be no need to seek remand for re-verdict. The basic rule for remand is that where there was sufficient evidence on record to decide the case itself, the court should seek remand. Before the service tribunal had all the evidence before it was bound, who had thoroughly examined it and explained the reasons, came to the conclusion that the authority's order was nothing arbitrary as has been brought on record. This kind of test or result was wrong, illegal or not on record, remand is not guaranteed. And the Service Tribunal correctly concluded from the record that no interference in the circumstances was guaranteed.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best advocate from Sibi lawyer