HOECHST PAKISTAN LIMITED, KARACHI versus PRESIDING OFFICER, PUNJAB LABOUR COURT NO. L , LAHORE
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 2 (xxviii) and 25 A Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art 199 Constitutional Application Probationer Termination of Services During Investigation of Medical Representative The Junior Labor Court rejected the request for a complaint on such application Employees are not laborers, plea was not eligible, however, Punjab Labor Court allowed the employee's appeal through the employee's appeal and ordered him to re-serve. The employee challenged in the constitutional petition is a medical representative and was supposed to promote the sale of drugs during the job; therefore, he was a salesman and not a workman; therefore, he filed a complaint against his termination of service. Could not, otherwise, the employee was on trial, therefore, he could not claim to be retained in the service, especially when it was specifically provided. No broader reasoning was sought in terms of service and termination, thus the probationer judge of the Punjab Labor Court was not sustainable in the law, as it was against the mandatory supply of the law and not the employees. The termination of the job with the termination of employment was lawful and in accordance with the law.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
