GHULAM MUSTAFA versus AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR
A writ of dissent between the jurisdiction established in section 96 of the Civil Code and the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VIII of 1974), Section 44 Mandams, Civil Court, while the Court of Appeal and its jurisdiction It was exercised by the High Court using the powers. Constitutional Jurisdiction The High Court cannot exercise its constitutional jurisdiction to appeal to the subordinate courts or local authorities or tribunals, unless the illegal orders or decisions of subordinate courts or local authorities or tribunals. Cannot isolate using In the constitutional jurisdiction, the writ of mandamus can be issued only if there was a legal right against the bereaved individual and the person against whom the mandamus was sought, which would impose an obligation on him to perform an act. Refrain from granting or even exercising the powers of the superior court. According to the limits and limits of the law binding under section 44, the EJ&K Act 1974 was limited and can only be used within the four corners of section 44 of the Constitution.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
pakistani advocates Tharparkar lawyer