Find a Lawyer

RAJA WALI versus MANSHA AHMAD

Decision on the affidavit of the plaintiff before the trial court under Article 123 (2), 96 and AXXIII, R3 Conan e Martyrs, (10 of 1984), Article 163 of the Code of Conduct, Code of Conduct, 1984 for the. The plaintiffs agree on the plaintiff's offer, and under the terms of the agreement between the parties, the plaintiff stated in the proof of his claim on the Qur'an, which was decided on the basis of the plaintiff's oath, the plaintiff appealed. In addition to filing, the petition was also filed under section 12 (2), complying with the appeal of the CPC to the claimant under section 12 (2), CPC fraud, misrepresentation and the grounds of jurisdiction. There was a right to resort, but they were not rejected by resorting to legal methods of appeal. Section 96, CPC only because it also filed an application under section 12 (2), CPC by any other case based on fraud, misrepresentation and jurisdiction over any decision / decree. The challenge cannot be challenged but only by application under the terms of section 1 (2), the right of appeal provided under CPC 96, CPC, however, is intact and cannot be denied. If it fosters fraud, misrepresentation and the desire for jurisdiction. immigration advocates email from Nowshera Cantt lawyer