Find a Lawyer

MESSERS SARTAJ FLOUR MILLS (PVT) LTD. HAVELIAN TEHSIL AND DISTRICT ABBOTTABAD versus AHMAD DIN

Accepting a complaint against the dismissal of employees while recovering from the Labor Court jurisdiction regarding the provisions of Sections 15, 17 and 22 of the Salary Payment Act 1936 (XXIII of 1969), Section 25A Labor Court He was entitled to payment. For the relevant period, the grantee challenged the Labor Court's order that a separate forum was provided under the Wages Act, 1936, to pay for the receipt of the grants, and under section 22, the jurisdiction of other courts. The authority disclaims claims that may be excluded from labor court. Employees were barred from ordering the payment of grants, because claims made under section 15 (1) of the Salary Payment Act, 1936, arising out of wages deductions or any payments made by the provident. Non-payment of fund liabilities may be decided. Delay in payment of law or wages, but he had no jurisdiction to determine the question of termination of service for which the Labor Court order should be appealed under section 25A of the J Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969, Under which employees were obliged against the order of the Labor Court with the right to pay the gratuity appeal under section 17 of the Payment of Employees Act, 1936. The Salary Payment Act is included in Section 22 of the Payment of Wages Act, 1936, therefore, it shall not apply to the labor court, but may be entertained by any case for any deduction from salary receipts or wages. Will not apply to civil court. top advocate from Pishin lawyer