Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD YOUNUS versus PAKISTAN INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES CORPORATION,KARACHI

Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 1 (3) (c) and 25A West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VII 1968), Section 1 (4) (c) Complaint application served under Pakistan International Airline Caring for paid employees. He was removed from the job after issuing show cause notices to the (PIA), but without any inquiry against him, the employees filed a court appeal when every employee of Pakistan International Airlines was considered a government employee. If the Department of Appeals had applied the West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Ordinance) Ordinance, 1968 after dismissing its departmental appeal against the employees of Pakistan International Airlines Corporation, instead of filing a second department appeal, the complaint was filed. After and the Labor Court's complaint was dismissed Yes, which was rejected after being rejected. The Appeal Department has received a fresh cause of action and from then on the West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance, 1968, was applied to the employee, dismissing his complaint request. Instead, their merits should have been heard, especially when the complaint petition was not dismissed, in accordance with the Labor Court's decision under the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969, according to which the employees' complaint was rejected. Was adjourned and the case was remanded for further judgment on merit. best advocate from Rawat lawyer