Find a Lawyer

SHAHZAD ALAM versus PRESIDING OFFICER, IVTH SINDH LABOUR COURT,KARACHI

Article 25A, 37 (3) and 51 of the Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969, the benefit of the employee's death during the course of the proceedings The entry of the legal representatives of the deceased employees, the scope of section 25A of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969, is very limited The employee closes. A worker, after his resignation or retirement, was generally unable to practice his treatment before the Labor Court's law applied that personal action also died with the person. Notwithstanding the requirement of section 25A of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969, to be considered independently in favor of the employee, if the employee had brought his complaint to court, the claim for payment of return benefits would not have been denied on his death. If it were to continue for the benefit of its legal representatives, there would be action Y Legal fiction, brought to the death of an employee by the act, not by his legal representatives or non-worker, was brought on by the deceased employee and the legal representatives of the deceased were substituted for employees only as employees. The original proceedings continue and no new action has been taken as the deceased's heirs are unemployed; there is no restriction under section 25 of the Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969. The employee's appeal for payment of compensation in return for the deceased employee's return through his legal inheritance will not be diminished even though the homosexual person's death due to non-personal privilege in relation to reappointment Will be extinguished. Assigned criminal advocate from Adda Shaiwala lawyer