Find a Lawyer

PARVEEN AKHTAR versus DIRECTOR F.I.A

Arrest and detention of constitutional petition filed before Principal Principal Principal Principal of Lahore High Court 1981 R 3 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 La Rformas Ordinance (XII of 1972), Section 3 arrest and detention of person in Lahore. Challenged High Court Single Judge Session forum Rawalpindi proper Returning the constitutional petition to file the same before the appropriate forum High Court Judge has jurisdiction over the entire province and areas within the territorial limits of the High Court. Used the question of whether to listen for any reason. It was administrative convenience on the principal seat or in any bench of the court, rather than affecting the individual or jurisdiction of the court which led to the arrest of the applicant's husband at Lahore at which the principal seat was located. Optionally, the Principal had the ability to sit on the petition filed, due to the action or at least part of it * was born out of the fact that the arrest o f the applicant's husband in the territorial jurisdiction of another bench. The warrant was issued accordingly, but there was no question as to whether the constitutional petition was pending with the High Court judge. Spill set can be filed on the order under which the applicant has. The constitutional petition was returned for submission to the appropriate forum, signed on one side by the Constitution law websites from Mehmood Kot lawyer