Find a Lawyer

SYED SHAMIM AKHTAR versus THE GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN

West Pakistan Maintenance of Public Order Ordinance 1960 Section 3 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 10 and 199 Constitution Petitioners Detained in terms of Section 3, Restoration of Public Ordinance of West Pakistan Rehabilitation, Providing Basis for Detention 1960 Justification of how to impose a bead on the execution of such an order The filing of a representation against the detention order, although no benefit has been obtained by Dento so far as to provide Ditto with no delay in detention. Was entitled and where the order of detention was to be stained with duties, that was his In the constitutional jurisdiction, the custody order had to be approved by the competent authority for the breach of the High Court and to justify the material laid before it and to specifically charge it with the custody of the authority garland. Had to be proven by individuals. The person who made such allegations guaranteed an immediate detention order through Article 10 of the Constitution, and such treatment was an effective alternative legal practice that was not taken advantage of by the DTN before the constitutional petition was filed by the court. Whether there was enough material before the detention authority before the detention. However, this question was passed on the basis of substantial material that was placed before the detention order before the detention order was granted, the weakness of the initial detention order, followed by the subsequent detention order. Because Danto was offering social service that wasn't enough. Approve public duties performed by public representatives first registration advocate from Lala rukh lawyer