Servants of the NWFP (Appointments, Promotions and Exchanges) Rules 1989 R10 (4) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Appointment and Retirement of Respondent at the Medical Employee's Place of Retirement of a Government Employee The public servant and his nephew, in his service, regularly challenged the claim that his nephew should have been appointed instead of the defendant, due to the trial. The trial court also appealed and revised the trial court's decision against the Rule 10 (4) of the trial court's accuracy, the Civil Frontier Province (Appointment, Proc. Ocean and Transfer) Regulations was rejected in 1989, which was for the benefit of children of civil servants showed that it was love that died during service. The son of a retired civil servant and the latter (his uncle) died during his retirement. Thus, there was no legal claim for appointment to the post which was left vacant upon retirement. His uncle (a civil servant) was not entitled to post the applicant in question, as the respondent objected to the appointment as a respondent, his appointment was not in violation of the relevant rules. And he was appointed as a regular in his job. The authority, even otherwise, had never applied for the position and, according to his claim that the law was irrevocable in the relationship, he had the right to challenge the appointment of a responsible person. There was no place, the leave of appeal was denied in the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
