DIRECTOR,PUBLICINSTRUCTIONS(SCHOOLS),PUNJAB versus NEELAMAMAR
Martial Law Regulation 1972 No. 118 Para 4 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) Terms of Service for Employees of Privately Administered Schools that the Government Demands for Equal Opportunity for Development or Selection Grade Was available to them. Although the government accepted the demands of employees of the same length of service, the service tribunal was not removed from the employees 'grievances, accepting the employees' appeals and ordering the previous service to serve the purpose of excellence. Will have the right to count. Service Length Claim for financial benefits that was granted to the officer of the General Cadre after completion of some length of service. The government's main complaint against the Service Tribunal's decision was that employees were entitled to count their services for the purpose of obtaining benefits available to personnel. The general cadre has only been in effect since 1975, when the essence of the celebrated schools was taken over by the provincial government, nor was such history disputed by Supreme Court employees before any date. Was assigned to the teachers and the duties they performed before nationalization were of the same nature and responsibility as those of the general cadre. No reason was given that 1 7 1975 Counting the length of the service of the former employees with the general cadre's employees for the purpose of giving them the benefits received against the service decision. Why was ignored. The tribunal was without merit and was dismissed
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
