Government Employees (Efficiency and Discipline) Rules 1973 R4 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) Removal of Corruption from Employment on Departmental Sentences Government servant was acquitted of a criminal case that is specific to his The money was listed on the charge of embezzlement of public servants. The request before the service tribunal against his dismissal that he was acquitted of criminal charges, therefore, the order to dismiss him from the job, which was granted on the basis of departmental proceedings, was also entitled to be set aside, Was suspended. Separate action was taken against a civil servant, his success in the criminal case will not justify keeping the sentence awarded to him as a result of departmental proceedings independently. Was initiated, its success in the criminal case will not undo the results of the prosecution proceedings. In the case of removal of a civil servant, who was ordered as a result of the prosecution, his dismissal in the criminal proceedings. No set set can be put in. Government employee is requested to work with him Other people had been proven to be accused of negligence but was not removed. The dismissal from the service and, therefore, against him, was discriminatory in nature. Such a request was rightly rejected by the service tribunal on the ground that other officers were prosecuted solely for inadequacy while legal action was taken against government employees for corruption. By a Government Employee
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
