Find a Lawyer

BASHIR AHMAD versus STATE

Section 302/34 Law Testimony (10 of 1984), Article 129, Illusions (G) The eye witnesses who are closely related to the deceased in view of the value of the evidence need to be hardened so that in case of a capital charge To be relied upon, but there was evidence on record to convince such a certified court conscience that the incident took place outside the victim's home at midnight where he was sleeping alone with a bulb that saw eye witnesses in the light. The incident was not taken. The presence of lightning in police custody and at this place was controlled, despite the presence of natural witnesses on the occasion, they were not presented in support of the incident and under the Law of Evidence (G), Article 129 Was supported by this incident and negative intervention. , 1984 It is easy to conclude that if he was born, he did not support the prosecution's version. The evidence was not a reliable piece of evidence was not due to the fact that the testimony was not divisible, their testimony which was not considered safe for the acquittal of the accompanying accused was to prove the accused in similar circumstances. Medical evidence was completely negated by the medical evidence. The account suspect was acquitted family advocate from Kabir Wala lawyer