NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN, KARACHI versus AINUL HAQ
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VI of 1968), Section 1 (4), Section 1 and Section O15 of the National Bank of Pakistan (Staff Service) Rules, 1973, R39 The employee who was dismissed from the service after issuing a charge sheet and after domestic inquiries against him, was accused of illicit use of the goods entrusted to him, a bank employee who was given immovable property worth several lakh rupees. The employee, who was mistreated unscrupulously, was disposed off and left nothing in the warehouse, the bank I cannot be employed again where people have expressed confidence and handed over their valuables. Delaying the priority of charge sheet to employees will lead to failed inquiries, especially when employed by the bank. It was ruled under its own legal rules and not the Order (Standing Order) Ordinance, by section O15 (4) of the West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Imperial, 1968, which was only one month from the date of mismanagement for charge sheet service. Given the time, Labor Court employees were ordered to be reinstated, these conditions were put aside Was
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for fresh advocates from Zhob lawyer