Find a Lawyer

AHMED SAMI versus SAADIA AHMED

Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Section 491 Constitution of Pakistan (1073), Article 185 (3) by the customary applicant (father) of the minors, it is claimed that the defendant (s) voluntarily applied to the minor children. Returned custody. The defendant denied that his care was his father's responsibility, and his request was that the minor be sent to the applicant's home on the request of the grandparents, but His custody was never restored. The order of the minor, four years and two years old, was passed by the High Court which was granted to the respondent for the restoration of the custody of the minor who was his mother. In those circumstances, the powers under Section 491, CR PC High Court were denied. Cannot be described as an exercise. In deciding an application under section 491, CCPC, in which the court was concerned only with the question of removing children who were less than the legal custody of the respondents, it should have been avoided in favor of the parties in the custody of the juveniles. Make any observation, as this question was already pending before the Guardian Judge Held; any observations made by the High Court concerning the merits of the applicant or defendant's claim, section 25 of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 The Guardian Judge in connection with the custody of both minors will be disqualified and disqualified in connection with the application under Remarks by the High Court in the application will be judged as unsafe. The leave for appeal was dealt with accordingly immigration advocates from Raiwind lawyer