Find a Lawyer

UNIVERSITY OF PUNJAB versus RUHI FARZANA

CHAP VII, Regln 23 B Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Conducted Candidates for Examination failed on two papers which applied for the examination of papers and were told that the candidates were subsequently given the marks. The requested Vice-Chancellor was asked to re-evaluate the papers, after which the Vice-Chancellor was asked to re-examine the Special Response Book if the papers were re-examined. Will be In exceptional cases where there is a solid basis to believe that the Vice-Chancellor may appoint more than one examiner. For re-examination at the same time ordering them where they were named by the Vice-Chancellor but did not name the other examiners and after receiving information from the designated examiners, sent them to another examiner like this. The exercise did not appear to be honest, the virtuous and transparent either the Vice-Chancellor should have named two examiners at the same time or accepted the report of the nominated examiner, which was not properly marked in the estimation papers. And the candidate was entitled to more marks that deserved to pass the exam, the other examiner had Referring to this, the receipt of such report was not guaranteed, and the response books also appear to have some tampering. The anonymous high court took notice of such rumors and the allegations that were unfounded and the respondent's script was tampered with and the mark sheet was not presented, leading to the re-examination of the first examiners through which the marks Accept what was added best law firms from Qambar lawyer