Find a Lawyer

SANA ULLAH versus MUHAMMAD MANZOOR

Constitution Pakistan 1973 Article 12 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art 185 (3) was the original agreement to sell because the appeal was not presented to the court and in the absence of it, it was possible to find a positive court, even if the shopkeeper. Executed an alleged contract to sell or not to sell. Even if it is not acceptable for the wise, the plaintiffs insist on writing the seller's contract in their favor, and on the other hand, allow the actual agreement in the possession of the executors and Only the photocopies were satisfied to be retained. However, according to the facts, the original should have been in the possession of the claimants in whose favor he was hanged, because of his photostat, the defendants (shopkeepers) should have been retained. That the evidence of the sale agreement and the receipt of payment of the sale price were not presented to the court on the pretext that they had been won by the defendants, and if presented by the courts in relation to such case. This speculation was not merely speculation, so the plaintiffs were legally required to present them as witnesses and if they denied their signature on the documents, they could request the court to dismiss them and ask the court to dismiss them. Should have asked for permission to inspect or would have asked the court to examine them as court witnesses Should have used That the document was sent to the expert to contest the signature of the plaintiff (s) and the opinion was received as negative, even if the opinion of the expert by the courts below was unlawful. Oh when you need a advocate from Lodhran lawyer