Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ABDUL KARIM versus MUHAMMAD SALEEM

Pakistan's Constitution 1973 Article 13 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 The Personal Needs of the Landlord's Personal Bone Not Present to the Court for Explaining Its Own Personal Needs of the Homeowner Why allow it to shop in the landlord? For the purposes of moving his business to this place, it was fully clear his need to move to Lahore that the High Court neither recorded the landlord's statement nor allowed the tenant to examine it and select. Dismissed the tenant's appeal against. The High Court had indicated in its judgment. That the landlord was a better judge of his needs and he should usually appear to the court to confirm his competence if the High Court decides this based on the evidence on record. There was no need to In deciding the second appeal, the High Court cited the evidence on record, but it is affirmed that the statement regarding his request for the landlord's personal need was strongly affected by the statement that the landlord did not say It was stated before the High Court regarding camel tenants that the landlord was not allowed to pass the landlord's examination through the High Court examination. Against the rules of natural justice and the extraordinary procedure adopted, the decision of the High Court was put aside because of the prejudice of the tenants and the matter was referred to the High Court for a new decision. The court directed that the second appeal be decided soon best advocate from Chowk Maitla lawyer