FAUJI SUGAR MILLS, DISTRICT HYDERABAD versus HAFEEZUDDIN
The Workman's Compensation Act, 1923, section 3 of the Workplace Occupational Illness Compensation Job suffered from a temporary occupational illness because of a welder, a chronic ulcer that eventually removed his left eye and The Commissioner for Workers was compensated with one lakh for the compensation. The award was resisted by the employer on the grounds that while the employee was on sick leave, he suffered an accident on the day when the employee temporarily suffered a professional illness from a job. Would mean injury by accident. The Workman's Compensation Act, 1923, and it will be deemed that during the course of employment, when the employee's eye was removed at the time of treatment, he was on leave when no compensation was given to the employees on this matter, I was paid appropriate compensation to the employee. An eye loss schedule, in situations
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
