GHULAM MURTAZA versus GENERAL MANAGER, M/S. HAKIMSONS CHEMICAL INDUSTRIES (PRIVATE) LIMITED, KARACHI
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 2 (xxviii) and 25 A West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VII 1968), termination of section 2 (i) and section O12 services by a letter of employment to employees The sources were terminated, but for no reason, the department in which the employee was working consisted of only two assistants, and in addition to a supervisor, the department had twelve machines that could not possibly be operated by two assistants. And he was the only supervisor who operated the machines himself. With the help of the other three persons, the employee became an employee and his services could not be terminated without a written order because the termination of the employee, stating the reason for his termination of employment, which was against Section O (12). Is violated. West Pakistan could not maintain the Standing Orders Ordinance, 1968
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous supreme court advocate from Badin lawyer
