Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD YASIN versus STATE

The Section 497 Contempt Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 302/324/148/149 bail accused were specifically designated in the FIR and did not depend on investigative opinion on their alibi application in the presence of eyewitnesses. Could have been done. In connection with the innocence of the accused found on the affidavits of some officials, there was no competent evidence in the law for the purpose of his alimony but the ocular evidence linking the accused to the alleged double murder was a prime fax. Was confirmed. The bail was denied under the circumstances by medical evidence family advocate from Quaidabad lawyer