Find a Lawyer

DILON LIMITED LABOUR UNION, LANDHI AREA, KARACHI versus DILON LIMITED, KARACHI

The interpretation of the jurisdiction of the Tribunal Labor Union in the Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 section 38 (3) and the 50 Employer Establishment filed before the Labor Appellate Tribunal under Section 50 of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969, to decide the question Here are the benefits to the employees under the settlement. Employers and workers in the union were in favor of increasing their performance and good behavior, and had nothing to do with any of the housing allowance costs and other benefits that they already had in the Industrial Relations Ordinance section. Developed 50 provisions, did not invest in 1969. The Labor Appellate Tribunal, by appeal to the Labor Appeal for the grant of reasonable compensation to the workers, has claimed that under the section 50 (3) of the Labor Appeal Tribunal under section 50 of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969 Jurisdiction did not match. Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969 Labor Appellate Tree Banal can only operate when there is a problem or doubt in interpreting any award or settlement and it is not to be in accordance with the language used under the interpretation rules. In accordance with the intention of the makers of this settlement. Was clean, the tribunal could not go back and could not find the parties' original intent Pakistan, top advocate family court from Hyderabad lawyer