Find a Lawyer

N.Y. & COMPANY OSMANABAD. KARACHI versus ALI FARMAN

Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25 Termination of Service The reinstatement employee, whose services were terminated verbally, was ordered to be reinstated by the Labor Court. Anxiety and that employee was not his worker, but rather the contractor's worker who controlled and paid for his work. The employers further alleged that they employed less than ten persons and less than five persons in their shop / office and that they were shops and establishment ordinances, 1965 and not the West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance, 1968. They applied because they employed less than twenty people. The basic questions for the determination were whether the Shops and Establishment Ordinance, applied to the employers office and warehouse in 1965 or the West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing and Ordinance, 1968) and whether the shop and warehouse belong to the same party. Or two different concerns, but the Labor Court did not set up any issue in this regard, nor did any inquiry into the issues to which the Labor Court order was separated and the matter raised. After recording evidence on the matter, a remand for re-adjudication was obtained attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Gari Habibullah lawyer