Find a Lawyer

JALAL-UD-DIN versus STATE

Section 2 302 and un 315 law marriages (1984 1984 to 10), the defendant did not make two deadly statements from the declaratory review of the evidence46 testimony and his final defamatory statement in the FIR was valid. Which has not lost its senses. Unable to speak, the doctor's signature or statements on the deceased's declaration were not necessary. The deceased statement was fully confirmed by the medical evidence, as well as the recovery evidence that the pistol was fired. The defendant's defense plea was not substantiated by credible evidence, thus proving that the victim had been shot at, not by a significant part of his body but by an important part of his body. According to medical evidence, the circumstances leading to the death of the accused were not sufficient, as usual. Therefore, the accused had no intention of killing the deceased and could be punished under Section 315, PPC, conviction of the accused under Section 302, PPC consequently, Section 315, P.P. It was changed under the PC and sentenced to pay Rs. the 75,000 late merger and passing through 7 years as azir RI law websites from Tarbela lawyer