MAHBOOB AHMED versus STATE
Sections 340, 342 and 561A of the Criminal Code (CRPC) Order (Enforcement Hadith) Order (4 of 1979); Despite the claim, the defendant's statement was recorded under section 342. , After recording such a statement and the CCP alleged that he would not choose to conduct his own oath examination or even ask if he wanted to present any evidence in defense. If so, it passed the judgment under Section 342 in the light of its statements and sentenced the accused. , CR PC: = Defendant pleaded not guilty and claimed trial, trial court could not record defendant's statement under Section 234 Cr, CR PC and such statement was only available to the prosecution witnesses Could have been registered only after the investigation and the accused had been summoned earlier. The defense was not offered to the accused to examine a witness in his defense, the essential provisions of the law were not complied with the resurrection,
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best law firms from Gujrat lawyer