Find a Lawyer

ABDUL SATTAR versus MITSUBISHI CORPORATION (INCORPORATED IN JAPAN WITH LIMITED LIABILITY), KARACHI

Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A Waste Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VII 1968), Section 1 (4) (a) and Section O12 Employees Rejected by Employees Against Their Termination The complaint request was resisted by the employer corporation and it was stated that the employer corporation, which is registered under the Shops and Establishment Ordinance 1965, employs less than twenty employees, thus, the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969 and West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Jobs (Standing Orders) Ordinance 1968 did not apply to the employees whose employees The sack was dismissed because of a reorganization and re-employment; he failed to prove that the employer corporation employed twenty or more employees, in the circumstances, on the petition filed against the employees against the employees. There was no jurisdiction to decide the petition. His dismissal was rightly dismissed as being able to maintain immigration advocate from Thul lawyer