Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25 Notice of Complaint Request for Complaint was sent by the employee to the employer after a gap of two years and the complaint was filed even after considerable delay and the court for redressing their grievances. There was no definitive explanation for the delay in approaching. The party will approach the court of competent jurisdiction to resolve any excessive number of complaints, explaining the satisfaction of the delayed forum every day as a valuable right was accumulated on the other side and necessary for the aggrieved party. That he can fulfill it. The forum in which its claim did not face a legal defect cannot be extended to any extent without any objection by repeatedly reaching out to top officials or unrelated officials of the state. Was obliged to examine the matter to see if the claim had been made before it entered. Fixed-term issues when the parties were aware of the requirements of the law and the nature of the complaints will not help the parties. It was the responsibility of the affected party to specify appropriate reasons for satisfying the court regarding the delay, nor was there any petition for condolences submitted before the court nor a case was presented. The court rightly rejected the complaint, using discretion in favor of the employees to apologize for the delay, in the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
