MUHAMMAD IQBAL versus GOVERNMENT OF N.-W.F.P.
Land Acquisition Act 1894 Section 23 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Compensation == Compensation Reduction negotiation matters were legally signed by the landowner and the company representative. Which had questions about beneficial land. The collector freely applied his mind and commitment to the land and there was no significant difference in the amount of compensation determined by it and the negotiations that resulted from the negot negotiated land cost the landowners without much protest. Was found when no object was raised in front of the collector when he was giving the award. In the presence of the parties on the basis of the discussions, the courts also found that the parties agreed and the compensation was substantial and the landowners deliberately accepted, where the appellate court found that the trial court proceedings. Based on a proper search evaluation. The evidence was in accordance with the principles of law and law, it is not necessary to discuss the whole evidence to confirm such a finding of the whole evidence, however, where it is necessary that the court's finding be disturbed or reversed. , No such weakness was identified, interference with the decisions of the courts below was not guaranteed under the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate for immigration from Jampur lawyer