Find a Lawyer

TAIMAR KHAN versus FAZAL RABI

Sections 145, 146 and 53 of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act 1967, Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3), the status of the underground land, the right to occupy such land before and after the partition of the Shamlat plaintiff, What was before the partition and even then the defendants were involved in the distribution of the shares, but after that it took effect, and it was made effective in the record of rights by certain changes, By then the plaintiffs were allotted to include other shareholders. The plaintiffs continued to occupy the land which the defendants occupied, which formed part of the joint holding prior to its partition, and in which their possession was a shareholder, as a result of the partition, the plaintiffs were allotted such land. The occupation was initially lawful, and the possession could be supplied until the possession was transferred to the legitimate owner until the possession was made under section 145, the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act, 1967. Acting on the device, which shall have the power, under section 146 of the Act, or an order of competent authority or a court of law. In the absence of evidence to provide for such possession by the defendants, the facts and the circumstances of the matter may be negatively seized. There was no interference in the High Court's decision under which the claimant was exclusively entitled to the possession of the land as special owner. Warrant Level Appeal's leave was denied in the circumstances top advocate from Dina lawyer