MUHAMMAD NAWAZ versus MITSUBISHI CORPORATION (INCORPORATED IN JAPANWITH LIMITED LIABILITY), KARACHI
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VII 1968), Section 1 (4) (a) and Section O12 Retirement Validity Employee challenged his retirement on his date of birth. According to this. The employer's record was different from the actual date of birth that the employees accepted for retirement and all its expenses. During his service he did not make any application for change in his date of birth as the employer was registered in the company. Apart from this the employer company could not prove that he employed twenty or more workers. In the absence of proof that the employee's date of birth was different as the employer is registered in the company, the employee's retirement was not premature because the employee's complaint request was excluded because of a hearing.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
